facilitating reflective practice for youth workers
Through guided reflection, youth workers taught each other their practice, knowledge, and expertise, and learned different ways of practicing youth work. In the meetings, as the facilitators helped youth workers reflect on their practice, other youth workers listened, noticed, asked questions, offered suggestions for problem solving, and engaged in joint decisionmaking.
Beschreibung der Aktivität
youth work professional development approaches - participatory action research (PAR)
Improvment of community-based youth work practice (mainly out-of-school time programs) by means of professional development approaches; Using participatory action research (PAR) philosophy and methods, this professional-development model engaged youth workers in self-reflective, collective, and collaborative dialogues and discussions about their practice. PAR is a process that ‘‘attempts to help people investigate and change their social and educational realities by changing some of the practices which constitute their lived realities’’ (Kemmis & Wilkinson, 1998, p. 21; Note: This is a secondary source. For more information, please check the bibliography of Ross Sheetak 2011). PAR as professional development model is on-going training that is situated in the learners’ practice contexts and is learner-driven, as well as learner-centered. The model described aimed to help youth workers reframe how they view their practice, their environments (where they live and work), their work, and themselves. This professional-development model is a collaborative project of a public youth serving agency, community organizations, and our university.
18 to 72
PraktikerInnen/ JugendarbeiterInnen/ MentorInnen
Evaluierung der Aktivität
The research design was qualitative and explorative. All participants in the two longest running professional-development groups were interviewed. The evaluation of the professional-development approach was conducted by an external evaluator and all participants were informed of the study intention and signed consent was obtained. Those in the third professional-development group were not interviewed as the evaluation research took place in the beginning phase of this group’s formation. Professional-development participants were individually interviewed and these were tape recorded and transcribed. Interviews were semi-structured (Patton, 2001; Note: This is a secondary source For more information, please check the bibliography of Ross Sheetak 2011.) and supported a conversation about participant’s experience in the professional-development group and what this experience meant to them and how they have used what they learned in their youth work practice. The site for this study, as noted, was a large youth serving public organization in a large U.S. Midwest city.