Wirkungsnachweis aus der Literatur

Mittelfristig (1 bis 5 Jahre)
Mikro (Individuum)
Psychisch & Physiologisch

persistent development of skills important for participation and active citizenship

Erwerb von fach- und bereichsspezifischen Kompetenzen

The results of both research strands provide evidence that E+/YiA projects contribute to the development of skills important for participation and active citizenship, and that these developments are persistent. Several results of the online survey study suggest a gain in participation and citizenship skills of participants. There is a small positive shift between the first and the second survey waves in the self-assessment of the participants (median levels change from 7.3 to 7.7; in the third and fourth survey waves the levels reach 7.6). In contrast, the control group sample does not exhibit any changes in between the measurements. The same is the case for detailed subgroup analyses, whilst in the participant sample there are several subgroups that indicate an increase between measurements, this does not apply to the control group sample. The primary increase between the first survey (before the project) and second survey (after the project) and a rather constant median level for the second, third and fourth survey suggests strong evidence that this increase of skills is actually caused by the project, in particular because the self-assessment of the control group does not change over all four survey waves. Furthermore, the participants themselves indicate rather high skill gains as an effect of the project when asked about this during the second, third and fourth survey wave. The median scores are rather high between 6.7 and 7.3. [...]According to the interview study, participants benefit from the project in the first instance by becoming aware of participation and citizenship skills they already possess, and by developing and deepening them through application in the project. To a smaller extent, interviewees also acquire new skills important for participation and active citizenship. The difference between acquiring new skills on one side and becoming aware and deepening already existing skills on the other side cannot be distinguished exactly. The interviews show a learning effect for the ability of individuals to negotiate successfully with other people (e.g. to cooperate, to communicate, to come to a compromise). The strongest effect can be seen for project management skills, whilst there is little evidence in the interviews that ‘discussing political issues seriously’, ‘keeping up with changes’ and ‘forming independent opinions’ are fostered through project participation.

Beschreibung der Aktivität

Erasmus+: Youth in Action Programme
A main objective of the Erasmus+ Programme in the field of youth is to empower and encourage young people to participate actively in society through the promotion of active citizenship and participation in society and democratic life in Europe in line with the provisions of the Lisbon Treaty (European Parliament and Council, 2013). Projects funded through E+/YiA should contribute to the development of competences relevant for participation and active citizenship as well as to the engagement of young people as active citizens in society.
europaweit
surveyed project participants: under 15 years: 4,7%, 15-17 years: 32,3%, 18-20 years: 28,5%, 21-25 years: 21,4%, 26-30 years: 13,1% surveyed project leaders: under 15 years: 0%, 15-17 years: 3,9%, 18-20 years: 8,5%, 21-25 years: 42,6%, 36-30 years: 45%
teilnehmende Kinder und Jugendliche PraktikerInnen/ JugendarbeiterInnen/ MentorInnen
Freiwillig engagierte Jugendliche

Evaluierung der Aktivität

The research questions are addressed through a mixed-method approach using quantitative and qualitative social research methods. Standardised multilingual online surveys were conducted with project participants and project leaders/team members as well as with a control group at four stages: before the core activity/the intensive phase of the project , two to three months after the end of the activity, one year after the end of the activity and again two to three years after the end of the activity. At each of the four stages (‘survey waves’ or ‘measurements’), the participants and project leaders were asked the same questions, including the same answer items in order to assess their participation/citizenship competences and practices in each survey wave and, thus, the change between the surveys. In addition, questions related to their profile and previous activities outside the project context were also addressed. In parallel, complementary qualitative interviews were conducted at three different stages: before the core activity/the intensive phase of the project, one year after its end and again two to three years after its end.
Index 'skills'
Discussing convincingly. Cooperating efficiently in a team. Forming independent opinions. Negotiating joint solutions. Discussing political issues seriously. Finding information. Coming up with ideas in the interest of a community. Getting along with people from different backgrounds. Keeping up with changes
subjective measurement
online survey: 449 project participants and 129 project leaders qualitative interviews: 82 participants
Interviews and surveys took place between 2015 and 2018.
Österreich
Forschungsbericht