Wirkungsnachweis aus der Literatur

Kurzfristig (< 1 Jahr)
Meso (Organisation/Gruppe)
Sozial

creating places and spaces for young people through youth work

soziale Inklusion

During the coding process, initially one final code – ‘cool atmosphere’ – was placed on its own, as it seemed to communicate something quite distinct. However, analysis of this final code and an exploration of its initial codes suggested links to the relationships that youth workers create within young people’s spaces and places. So the code was concerned with buildings and places, but it was also concerned with the relational spaces contained within them. For example, the final code ‘cool atmosphere’ is not only informed by the initial code ‘relaxed, warm and safe place to meet others’ but also by ‘to be accepted as oneself’. In the latter code the role of the youth worker is essential in making the young people feel accepted and in ensuring that young people accept each other. Links were then made to other final codes which communicate the role of the youth worker in this process, such as English final code ‘mutuality’, which is based in part on the initial code ‘being included’. The Estonian code ‘development of relationships with adults’ also refers to ‘youth worker support’. Although the French code ‘experiencing positive emotions’ was not placed in this category, it includes the initial code ‘positive memories and experiences’, and the stories refer specifically to ‘good memories at the youth centre’ so it may well have been placed here.

Beschreibung der Aktivität

The Erasmus-funded project entitled Developing and Communicating the Impact of Youth Work in Europe (DCIYWE) engaged three youth projects in each of the five countries of England, Estonia, Finland, France and Italy.
The Erasmus-funded project entitled Developing and Communicating the Impact of Youth Work in Europe (DCIYWE) engaged three youth projects in each of the five countries of England, Estonia, Finland, France and Italy.
europaweit
age range of respondents: Estonia - 7 to 23 (average 14,2), England - 10 to 20 (average: 14,6), Finland - 12 to 29 (average 17,7), France - 11 to 29 (average 17,8) and Italy - 14 to 35 years (average 25,3)
Einrichtungen/ Träger der Kinder- und Jugendarbeit

Evaluierung der Aktivität

Each youth work project then implemented three cycles of transformative evaluation over a period of one year, between July 2015 and July 2016. The identification of youth workers and stakeholders was left to the discretion of individual projects. [...] In each cycle each youth worker aimed to generate twenty significant change stories using the following prompt question: ‘Looking back, what do you think has been the most significant change that occurred for you, you and your peers, or you and your community, as a result of coming here?’ [...] Recording stories can be done in two ways. First, handwritten notes can be taken during the conversation; however, it is essential that any notes are read back to the young person to check that they accurately reflect the essence of their story. The story is more valid when recorded in the young person’s own words. Alternatively, the young person can write their story directly. Where possible, a story should be written as a simple narrative describing the sequence of events that took place and their significance to the young person. In terms of story length, generally the young people’s stories tend be a paragraph (three or four sentences) but some may be much longer and some shorter. They should not be o short that vital information is left out.
creating places and spaces for young people
Encountering an empathetic youth worker Cool atmosphere Mutuality Development of relationships with adults
Estonia: 164 England: 143 Finland: 123 France: 134 Italy: 151
July 2015 to July 2016
Finland
Sammelbandbeitrag